date compiled: 2026-04-14

institution: Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)

type: think-tank

description: CSIS senior fellow Clayton Seigle mapped four oil disruption scenarios ahead of any U.S./Israel strike on Iran — from Kharg Island blockade (1.6 mb/d, +$10-12/bbl) to full Gulf closure (21 mb/d, +$50/bbl) — providing the pre-war playbook for how the actual crisis unfolded.

author: Clayton Seigle, Senior Fellow and James R. Schlesinger Chair in Energy and Geopolitics

source: https://www.csis.org/analysis/if-trump-strikes-iran-mapping-oil-disruption-scenarios

source date: March 2, 2026

questions addressed: Q1, Q2


Related Articles

Q1 Supply Destruction · Q2 Price Impact · Historical Parallels


The Four Scenarios

Scenario 1: U.S. or Israel Disrupts Iranian Crude Oil Shipments

Scenario 2: Iran Disrupts Arab Gulf Oil Shipping

Scenario 3: U.S. or Israel Directly Attacks Iranian Oil Facilities

Scenario 4: Iran Directly Attacks Arab Gulf Oil Facilities


Hormuz Bypass Potential: Confirmed as Very Limited

RouteCapacityCurrent UseSpare Capacity
Saudi East-West Pipeline (Yanbu)5 mb/d~800 kb/d exports + ~1.8 mb/d to Saudi refineries~2.4 mb/d (vs. Saudi's typical 6 mb/d from Gulf terminals — less than half can be rerouted)
UAE Pipeline to Fujairah~1 mb/d~1 mb/d already via FujairahRemaining third (~1 mb/d) stranded in Hormuz closure
Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, QatarNo bypass0 — fully stranded
Qatar LNG10 bcf/dNo bypass0 — fully stranded

Key finding: Only Saudi Arabia has meaningful bypass capacity (2.4 mb/d spare). Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar have zero bypass capacity — their exports are fully hostage to Hormuz transit.


Key Strategic Insight: Iran's "Use It or Lose It" Dilemma

CSIS analysis describes a potential escalation ladder:

  1. U.S./Israel starts with Scenario 1 (disrupts Iranian shipments) → Iran responds with Scenario 2 (disrupts Arab Gulf shipping)
  2. U.S. seeks to neutralize Iran's naval/shore anti-ship capabilities → Iran left with only Scenario 4 (attacks Arab Gulf oil facilities) as deterrent
  3. Iran faces "use it or lose it" dilemma → risk of miscalculation leading to Scenario 4 as Iran's "last card"
  4. Scenario 4 → U.S. implements Scenario 3 (attacks Iranian oil facilities) → seeks outright regime defeat/destruction

Scenario 4 is the outer bound — it represents the escalation ceiling and defines the upper bound of the price scenarios ($130+).


Relevance to Current Crisis

The CSIS analysis was published March 2, 2026 — before the actual conflict began. The current situation most closely maps to Scenarios 2/3 combined: Hormuz is constrained (not fully closed), there has been infrastructure damage, and the ceasefire is fragile. Scenario 4 remains the named outer bound if the ceasefire collapses and Iran escalates to attacking Arab Gulf infrastructure directly.

Q1 Supply Destruction · Q2 Price Impact · Historical Parallels

Bibliography

CSIS-Seigle-2026.md