titleWood Mackenzie: Hormuz Closure Could Send Oil to $200 — Three Scenarios
sourcegCaptain / Wood Mackenzie Horizons Report
authorPeter Martin (Head of Economics, Wood Mackenzie); Massimo Di Odoardo (VP Gas & LNG Research)
date2026-05-21

Key Claims

  1. Three scenarios: Quick Peace ($80), Summer Settlement ($120-150), Extended Disruption ($200)
  2. 11+ mb/d Gulf crude and condensate production curtailed
  3. 80+ mt/yr LNG supply (~20% of global) inaccessible
  4. Extended disruption: Brent approaches $200/bbl by end-2026
  5. Diesel and jet fuel could reach $300/bbl in major refining centers
  6. Global economy could contract 0.4% in 2026 — third global recession this century
  7. Middle East GDP could shrink 10.7%; EU GDP -1.5%; US growth <1% in 2026-2027
  8. Some Gulf LNG capacity could be permanently lost; 75 mt/yr projects under construction face multi-year delays
  9. Quick peace: Brent falls to ~$80 by year-end, ~$65 in 2027

Source: gCaptain / Wood Mackenzie Horizons Report — May 21, 2026

Author: Peter Martin (Head of Economics), Massimo Di Odoardo (VP Gas & LNG Research)

Current Disruption Scale

Three Scenarios

Scenario 1: Quick Peace

Scenario 2: Summer Settlement

Scenario 3: Extended Disruption

LNG Dimension (Unique to WoodMac)

Significance

Wood Mackenzie's three-scenario framework provides the most structured analytical lens for the Hormuz crisis. The $200 worst-case is grounded in supply/demand math (6 mb/d demand destruction still insufficient to offset supply loss). The LNG dimension is unique — no other source has quantified the 80 mt/yr LNG gap and its structural implications for global energy transition.

The permanent LNG capacity loss scenario is a structural long-term concern that extends beyond the immediate crisis.

Wood-Mackenzie-Hormuz-Scenarios-Jun-2026.md