Strategic Fragility: A Deep Analysis of the 2026 Strait of Hormuz Crisis and the Global Energy Destabilization**
The escalation of the 2026 Persian Gulf conflict has fundamentally altered the paradigm of global energy security, precipitating what the International Energy Agency (IEA) has formally characterized as the most severe supply disruption in the history of the modern oil market.1 Following the initiation of joint United States and Israeli air strikes on Iranian infrastructure on February 28, 2026, the subsequent blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has paralyzed a transit route responsible for approximately 20% of the world’s petroleum and 20% of its liquefied natural gas (LNG).3 This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the energy supply destruction, the resultant pricing volatility, and the physical security implications for European and Asian markets, drawing upon the latest findings from global energy institutions, investment banks, and field observations.
**The Anatomy of Supply Destruction: Depth and Duration Scenarios**
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz represents a non-linear shock to the global energy balance. Unlike the targeted embargoes of the 1970s or the production-centric disruptions of 1990 and 2022, the 2026 crisis combines total maritime interdiction with the physical destruction of energy infrastructure.2 This has rendered the world’s primary source of spare capacity effectively stranded, as the export terminals of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Kuwait feed directly into the now-inaccessible waterway.7
**Quantitative Impact on Global Production**
The scale of the shut-in is unprecedented. By March 2026, global oil supply plunged by an estimated 8 million to 10 million barrels per day (mb/d).1 The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) assesses that the collective shut-in from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE, Qatar, and Bahrain reached 7.5 million b/d in March, with a projected peak of 9.1 million b/d in April 2026\.10 These figures, while conservative, illustrate the logistical bottleneck created when storage facilities at Gulf ports reached maximum capacity, forcing upstream production cuts.11
Beyond crude oil, the disruption to natural gas and refined products is equally acute. The IEA estimates that 2 mb/d of condensates and natural gas liquids (NGLs) are currently shut in.1 Furthermore, more than 3 mb/d of refining capacity in the Persian Gulf region has been idled due to direct attacks or the lack of export outlets.9
| Country / Region | March 2026 Production Shut-in (mb/d) | % of Pre-Conflict Capacity | Primary Infrastructure Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iraq | 2.82 | \~62% | Southern export terminal blockade |
| Saudi Arabia | 1.90 | \~16% | Reliance on East-West pipeline capacity |
| Kuwait | 1.25 | \~45% | Total Hormuz dependency |
| UAE | 1.11 | \~28% | Damage to Fujairah ADCOP terminal |
| Qatar | \~0.60 | \~40% | Ras Laffan LNG/Condensate outage |
| Iran | \~1.60 | \~50% | Kharg Island and refinery strikes |
| Central Asia (Kazakhstan) | \~1.20 | \~70% | CPC Pipeline sabotage |
Data synthesized from EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook April 2026 and BP Ramsay CERAWeek briefing.7
**Duration and Recovery Pathways**
The duration of the crisis is the primary determinant for global economic modeling. Analysts have established three core scenarios based on the military and diplomatic trajectory of the conflict.
The best-case scenario, modeled on the assumption that the provisional ceasefire of April 7 leads to a permanent reopening, suggests that traffic through the Strait could gradually resume in May 2026\.10 In this scenario, production shut-ins would fall to 6.7 million b/d in May and return to pre-conflict levels by late 2026\.10 However, Goldman Sachs notes that even after a reopening, the "Hormuz risk" will be permanently repriced, keeping a structural premium on global barrels.3
The base-case scenario, advocated by Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan, assumes that flows through the Strait remain at approximately 5% of normal levels for at least six weeks, followed by a one-month gradual recovery.3 This results in cumulative oil losses exceeding 800 million barrels, a volume that the International Energy Agency’s 400-million-barrel reserve release can only partially mitigate.1
The worst-case scenario involves the "effective closure" of the waterway for three months or longer. Under this framework, BP’s chief oil economist Gareth Ramsay warns that the disruption is "incomparable" to any prior historical event, with net supply losses reaching 15 million to 16 million b/d when accounting for secondary infrastructure damage.7 In Central Asia, the damage to the CPC pipeline, which carries 70% of Kazakhstan's crude, is expected to take three to five years to resolve, effectively removing these barrels from the short-term recovery outlook.7
**Diplomatic Volatility: Trump’s Deadline and the Islamabad Summit**
The current status of negotiations is highly fragile. On April 7, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump set a deadline for Tehran to reopen the Strait, warning of "Total Regime Change" and the potential destruction of "a whole civilization" if a deal was not reached.12 This ultimatum preceded a provisional two-week ceasefire, where Iran agreed to a temporary reopening of the Strait under "Iranian management," involving a $2 million transit fee per vessel to fund reconstruction.12
This provisional agreement, facilitated by Pakistani and Chinese intermediaries, is seen as a tactical pause rather than a resolution. The "10-point peace plan" submitted by Iran includes demands for the lifting of all sanctions, a complete U.S. military withdrawal from the Middle East, and the release of frozen assets.12 The upcoming summit in Islamabad on April 10, 2026, will be the definitive test of whether these terms can prevent a return to full-scale hostilities.12
**Price Impact and the Mechanics of Demand Destruction**
The financial response to the physical supply vacuum has been defined by extreme volatility and the breakdown of traditional pricing relationships. Brent crude, the global benchmark, has seen its steepest one-month gains in history, trading within a "whisker" of $120/bbl before settling in the $100–$115 range as markets digested ceasefire rumors.1
**Historical Context and Institutional Forecasts**
Institutional analysts have revisited the 1973, 1979, and 1990 oil shocks to benchmark the potential peak of the 2026 crisis. However, the current deficit is more than three times the volume lost during the 1973 embargo, while global consumption has nearly doubled since that era.6
| Institution | Forecast (2Q 2026\) | 2026 Full-Year Average | Scenario Assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIA (STEO) | $115/b (Brent Peak) | $90/b (Peak Avg) | Short-term conflict, May recovery |
| Goldman Sachs | $110/b (March/April) | $85/b (Raised from $77) | 6-week core blockade |
| Morgan Stanley | $150–$180/b | $100–$110/b | Effective closure / Constraints |
| JPMorgan | $150/b (Escalation) | $100/b (Partial De-esc) | Sustained hostilities |
| Qatar (Kobeissi) | $150/b | N/A | Prolonged gas/oil interdiction |
Data source: Goldman Sachs 3, EIA 10, Morgan Stanley 16, JPMorgan.17
The price of refined products has surged even more dramatically than crude. In the United States, retail gasoline is forecast to peak at $4.30/gal in April 2026, while diesel is expected to exceed $5.80/gal.10 In Europe, physical cargo prices, such as jet fuel in Rotterdam, have already surpassed $200/bbl equivalent, reflecting the acute scarcity of middle distillates.16
**Short-Run vs. Long-Run Price Elasticity**
The market’s inability to balance through supply increases has placed the entire burden of adjustment on demand. In the short run (0–6 months), the price elasticity of oil demand is near zero.18 Consumers and industrial users have limited immediate ability to switch fuels or reduce essential transportation, meaning prices must rise to extraordinary levels to force consumption cuts.5
JPMorgan Commodities Research indicates that current prices (roughly $110/bbl) have only reduced global demand by approximately 1 mb/d.17 Significant "demand destruction"—defined as a reduction in consumption large enough to balance the 8–10 mb/d deficit—would likely require prices exceeding $150/bbl.17 At this level, the shock transitions from an inflationary event to a growth shock, triggering the "recession playbook".16
Goldman Sachs has already adjusted its macroeconomic outlook, raising its 12-month U.S. recession probability to 30%.3 The bank notes that every 10% rise in oil prices shaves 0.1 percentage points off GDP growth and adds 0.2 percentage points to PCE inflation.3 Consequently, the Federal Reserve has pushed back its anticipated rate cuts from June to September 2026, as headline inflation is projected to end the year at 2.9%.3
**The Refining Paradox and Global Trade Rerouting**
A critical insight from physical market traders at Vitol and Trafigura is that "paper" futures do not reflect the reality of the physical cargo market. The "crack spread"—the difference between the price of crude and the refined products—has reached record levels because the Strait of Hormuz is a hub for high-complexity refineries that produce diesel and jet fuel.1
With the Strait closed, tankers are being forced to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope, adding 10–14 days to the voyage from the Middle East to Europe or Asia.15 This "voyage lag" has created a 14-day supply gap in European ports, as the final cargoes that transited the Strait before the conflict have been consumed, while the diverted cargoes have not yet arrived.15 This has led to the "U-turning" of supertankers in the Atlantic as Asian buyers, particularly in India and China, outbid European importers for available Atlantic Basin crude.15
**Impact on Europe: From Price Volatility to Physical Rationing**
Europe’s vulnerability to the Hormuz closure is multifaceted, involving a high dependence on Middle Eastern diesel, a fragile natural gas balance, and a reliance on the Strait for critical industrial feedstocks.
**Exposure and Energy Security Metrics**
The closure has removed 1.5 million tonnes (Mt) of LNG per week from the global market—approximately 19% of global LNG exports.23 For Europe, which has spent the last four years diversifying away from Russian pipeline gas toward seaborne LNG, this loss is existential. Qatari LNG exports, which primarily transit the Strait, have ceased entirely following QatarEnergy’s declaration of Force Majeure on March 3\.2
| Importer | % Reliance on Hormuz (Oil) | % Reliance on Hormuz (LNG) | Real-World Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greece | \~55% | N/A | Extreme price spikes |
| Italy | \~15-20% | \~10% | Confirmed jet fuel rationing |
| Germany | \~12-15% | \~8% | Supply scarcity warnings for May |
| United Kingdom | \~10-12% | \~15% | Formal fuel shortage warnings |
Source: JPMorgan Asset Management and Wood Mackenzie.11
European gas storage levels are currently 10% below 2025 levels, leaving the continent with a thin buffer as it enters the spring refilling season.24 Wood Mackenzie reports that when the Dutch TTF gas price rises by €30/MWh, German electricity prices follow with a €40/MWh increase, demonstrating the direct pass-through from the Hormuz crisis to the European industrial base.24
**Real-World Observations: The Aviation and Retail Crisis**
Physical shortages are no longer a forecast; they are an observed reality. In Northern Italy, Air BP Italia has issued emergency NOTAMs (Notice to Airmen) effective until at least April 9, 2026\.22 These notices impose strict rationing at four major airports: Bologna (BLQ), Venice (VCE), Milan Linate (LIN), and Treviso (TSF).22
The rationing caps short-haul flight fuel uplift at just 2,000 to 2,500 liters per aircraft.22 For context, a standard Airbus A320 requires 18,000 to 26,000 liters for a typical service.22 This has forced airlines like Ryanair and ITA Airways to implement "tankering"—carrying extra fuel from outside the restricted zone—or making unscheduled technical stops to refuel, resulting in hundreds of flight disruptions and cancellations.22
At the retail level, fuel stress is surfacing in major European capitals. In Paris, field reports confirm local gas stations having no gasoline or diesel, leaving only E85 available. In Germany, Economy Minister Katherina Reiche has warned that supply scarcity could hit the broader market by late April or early May if shipments do not resume.25
**Industrial Shutdowns and the Fertilizer Threat**
The energy shock is cascading into the chemical and agricultural sectors. The Strait of Hormuz handles over 30% of the world’s seaborne urea exports, a fundamental component of global fertilizer production.2 Wood Mackenzie estimates that a one-month blockade stalls the export of roughly 4 million tonnes of gas-based products, including methanol, ammonia, and urea.26
European petrochemical plants, already operating at near-breakeven economics prior to the war, are now facing "shock upon shock".26 Benchmark olefins and polyolefins prices surged 30% within days of the conflict’s start, forcing producers in Singapore, South Korea, and across Europe to declare Force Majeure as they run out of feedstock.26 This creates a direct link between the Strait of Hormuz blockade and global food price inflation, as the cost of basic staples like wheat and corn is heavily tied to fertilizer availability.2
**Institutional Disagreements and Market Divergence**
The 2026 crisis has highlighted significant disagreements between academic analysts, institutional researchers, and physical market traders. Documenting these divergences is essential for a comprehensive understanding of the evolving risk.
**Disagreement 1: The Duration of the Supply Gap**
There is a notable conflict between the EIA’s assumption and the warnings from commodity traders. The EIA STEO (April 2026\) assumes the conflict "does not persist past April," allowing for a gradual recovery of supply through the end of the year.10 Conversely, traders at Vitol and Trafigura emphasize that the "voyage lag" and the militarization of the Gulf mean that even if a ceasefire is signed today, the physical market will remain tight for at least another 45–60 days as tankers are repositioned and insurance premiums remain prohibitive.15
**Disagreement 2: The Reliability of Spare Capacity**
While OPEC+ has officially agreed to a modest production increase of 206,000 b/d starting in April, analysts at Rystad Energy and BP characterize this as a "signal" rather than a solution.7 The disagreement centers on whether Saudi Arabia and the UAE can effectively deploy their 3.5 million b/d of spare capacity. Optimists point to the Saudi East-West pipeline; skeptics point out that this route is already at capacity and is vulnerable to Houthi attacks, meaning "spare capacity" on paper is "stranded capacity" in practice.7
**Disagreement 3: Equity Market Resilience**
Investment banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have offered conflicting advice on energy equities. Goldman Sachs remains bullish on U.S. refiners like Valero (VLO) and Marathon (MPC), arguing they benefit from the "geopolitical insulation" of being net exporters with access to domestic crude.3 Morgan Stanley, however, warns that if oil hits the $150–$180 "recession playbook" range, even energy stocks will suffer as the broader earnings cycle collapses, advocating instead for defensive sectors like utilities and telecoms.16
**Gaps in Current Research and Emerging Vulnerabilities**
Despite the intensity of current reporting, several critical areas remain under-researched or opaque:
- **The Cyber-Kinetic Link:** There is limited data on the role of GPS and satellite navigation disruption in the Strait. Reports from Kpler suggest tanker traffic dropped partly due to navigation systems being jammed, but the long-term impact on maritime insurance for autonomous or semi-autonomous vessels is unmapped.5
- **The Food-Energy Feedback Loop:** While the urea shortage is documented, the cumulative impact of higher fuel costs for harvesting and transportation on global food security in late 2026 is not yet fully modeled by the IMF or World Bank.2
- **Strategic Reserve Refill Demand:** There is little analysis on the "post-crisis" demand surge that will occur when nations attempt to refill the strategic reserves (IEA and SPR) drawn down during March and April 2026\. This "rebuilding bid" could act as a permanent price floor.3
- **Central Asian Alternative Routing:** The feasibility of rerouting Kazakhstan’s crude through the Trans-Caspian route to bypass the damaged CPC pipeline is mentioned by officials but lacks a detailed capital expenditure or timeline analysis.7
**Synthesis and Strategic Outlook**
The 2026 Strait of Hormuz crisis is not merely an energy price event; it is a structural transformation of the global economy. The reliance on a single, 24-mile-wide chokepoint for 20% of the world’s energy has been exposed as the primary systemic risk of the 21st century.3
**Summary of Key Findings**
- **Supply Destruction:** The world is facing a net loss of 9.1 million to 16 million b/d, a volume three times larger than the 1973 shock.7
- **Duration Scenarios:** While the April 7 ceasefire offers a best-case "out," the structural damage to Qatari gas facilities and Central Asian pipelines ensures that energy tightness will persist through 2027\.7
- **Pricing Reality:** Brent crude is anchored above $100/bbl, with a realistic "escalation" peak of $150–$180/bbl if the Islamabad summit fails.16
- **European Fragility:** Physical rationing has begun in Italy, and fuel scarcity is expected in Germany and the UK by late April.22
The "Operation Epic Fury" and the subsequent Tanker War of 2026 have effectively ended the era of "just-in-time" energy delivery.7 For the global community, the immediate task is managing the transition from an inflation crisis to a potential growth crisis. As noted by BP’s Gareth Ramsay at CERAWeek, "efficiency is also sometimes fragility," and the price for a more resilient, diversified energy system will be higher costs and lower growth for the remainder of the decade.7 The upcoming negotiations in Pakistan represent the only immediate off-ramp from a scenario that JPMorgan warns could lead to a full-scale European recession and a global economic "catastrophe".15
**Sources des citations**
- Oil Market Report \- March 2026 – Analysis \- IEA, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.iea.org/reports/oil-market-report-march-2026](https://www.iea.org/reports/oil-market-report-march-2026)
- 2026 Iran war fuel crisis \- Wikipedia, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026\_Iran\_war\_fuel\_crisis](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_war_fuel_crisis)
- Goldman Sachs reset oil price forecast for the rest of 2026 \- TheStreet, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.thestreet.com/investing/goldman-sachs-reset-oil-price-forecast-for-the-rest-of-2026](https://www.thestreet.com/investing/goldman-sachs-reset-oil-price-forecast-for-the-rest-of-2026)
- Goldman Sachs raises oil price forecasts on Hormuz supply disruption \- Investing.com, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.investing.com/news/analyst-ratings/goldman-sachs-raises-oil-price-forecasts-on-hormuz-supply-disruption-93CH-4550269](https://www.investing.com/news/analyst-ratings/goldman-sachs-raises-oil-price-forecasts-on-hormuz-supply-disruption-93CH-4550269)
- Energy prices surge as tanker disruptions, facility shutdowns rattle global supply \- Indianapolis Business Journal, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.ibj.com/articles/energy-prices-surge-as-tanker-disruptions-facility-shutdowns-rattle-global-supply](https://www.ibj.com/articles/energy-prices-surge-as-tanker-disruptions-facility-shutdowns-rattle-global-supply)
- Oil Shock of 1973-74 \- Federal Reserve History, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/oil-shock-of-1973-74](https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/oil-shock-of-1973-74)
- CERAWeek 2026: Global Oil Supply Disruption Unprecedented in ..., consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.opis.com/resources/energy-market-news-from-opis/ceraweek-2026-global-oil-supply-disruption-unprecedented-in-scale-with-no-near-term-resolution-executives-say/](https://www.opis.com/resources/energy-market-news-from-opis/ceraweek-2026-global-oil-supply-disruption-unprecedented-in-scale-with-no-near-term-resolution-executives-say/)
- Oil prices could hit $100/bbl as Strait of Hormuz traffic halts | Wood Mackenzie, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.woodmac.com/press-releases/oil-prices-could-hit-$100bbl-as-strait-of-hormuz-traffic-halts/](https://www.woodmac.com/press-releases/oil-prices-could-hit-$100bbl-as-strait-of-hormuz-traffic-halts/)
- 12 March 2026, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/a25ddf53-cd6c-4910-ac90-16bfd28399e7/-12MAR2026\_OilMarketReport.pdf](https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/a25ddf53-cd6c-4910-ac90-16bfd28399e7/-12MAR2026_OilMarketReport.pdf)
- Short-Term Energy Outlook \- EIA, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/pdf/steo\_full.pdf](https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/pdf/steo_full.pdf)
- The Middle East conflict is becoming an energy problem \- J.P. Morgan Private Bank, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://privatebank.jpmorgan.com/eur/en/insights/markets-and-investing/tmt/the-middle-east-conflict-is-becoming-an-energy-problem](https://privatebank.jpmorgan.com/eur/en/insights/markets-and-investing/tmt/the-middle-east-conflict-is-becoming-an-energy-problem)
- Oil back above $110 in volatile markets as Trump deadline looms for ..., consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.theguardian.com/business/live/2026/apr/07/oil-price-rises-trump-deadline-iran-reopen-strait-of-hormuz-imf-business-live-news](https://www.theguardian.com/business/live/2026/apr/07/oil-price-rises-trump-deadline-iran-reopen-strait-of-hormuz-imf-business-live-news)
- Morgan Stanley Names Top European Energy Stocks Amid Commodity Rebound, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/morgan-stanley-names-top-european-energy-stocks-amid-commodity-rebound-93CH-4579976](https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/morgan-stanley-names-top-european-energy-stocks-amid-commodity-rebound-93CH-4579976)
- Goldman lifts oil price forecast amid Hormuz disruptions, lower inventories \- Investing.com, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.investing.com/news/commodities-news/goldman-lifts-oil-price-forecast-amid-hormuz-disruptions-lower-inventories-4539959](https://www.investing.com/news/commodities-news/goldman-lifts-oil-price-forecast-amid-hormuz-disruptions-lower-inventories-4539959)
- 'It's all fear and headlines': energy traders race to keep pace with volatile oil markets | Oil, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/apr/05/its-all-fear-and-headlines-energy-traders-race-to-keep-pace-with-volatile-oil-markets](https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/apr/05/its-all-fear-and-headlines-energy-traders-race-to-keep-pace-with-volatile-oil-markets)
- Oil Price Shock: How Energy Moves Are Reshaping Markets, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.morganstanley.com/insights/podcasts/thoughts-on-the-market/oil-shock-scenarios-reshaping-markets-rajeev-sibal](https://www.morganstanley.com/insights/podcasts/thoughts-on-the-market/oil-shock-scenarios-reshaping-markets-rajeev-sibal)
- Navigating the impact of the Middle East conflict | J.P. Morgan Asset ..., consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://am.jpmorgan.com/hu/en/asset-management/institutional/insights/market-insights/market-updates/on-the-minds-of-investors/iran-conflict-strait-of-hormuz-energy-prices-inflation-growth/](https://am.jpmorgan.com/hu/en/asset-management/institutional/insights/market-insights/market-updates/on-the-minds-of-investors/iran-conflict-strait-of-hormuz-energy-prices-inflation-growth/)
- IEA Oil Market Report 2026: Global Supply-Demand Outlook \- Discovery Alert, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://discoveryalert.com.au/petroleum-market-balance-shift-2025/](https://discoveryalert.com.au/petroleum-market-balance-shift-2025/)
- Oil Price Shocks: Central Risk to U.S. Economy in 2026, Morgan Stanley Warns \- IndexBox, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.indexbox.io/blog/oil-prices-pose-central-risk-to-us-economy-morgan-stanley-says/](https://www.indexbox.io/blog/oil-prices-pose-central-risk-to-us-economy-morgan-stanley-says/)
- Gasoline: recovery in cracks giving market whiplash as risk priced very much back in, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.spartacommodities.com/insights/gasoline-recovery-in-cracks-giving-market-whiplash-as-risk-priced-very-much-back-in/](https://www.spartacommodities.com/insights/gasoline-recovery-in-cracks-giving-market-whiplash-as-risk-priced-very-much-back-in/)
- Strait of Hormuz Shut: Tanker War of 2026 Disrupts Global Oil and LNG Trade, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://openthemagazine.com/world/strait-of-hormuz-shut-tanker-war-of-2026-disrupts-global-oil-and-lng-trade](https://openthemagazine.com/world/strait-of-hormuz-shut-tanker-war-of-2026-disrupts-global-oil-and-lng-trade)
- Italy Airport Chaos & Fuel Crisis: Rome Milan April 2026, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.traveltourister.com/news/italy-airport-chaos-fuel-crisis-rome-milan-venice-april-2026/](https://www.traveltourister.com/news/italy-airport-chaos-fuel-crisis-rome-milan-venice-april-2026/)
- The Strait of Hormuz closure pressures LNG spot prices, threatens Northeast Asia demand, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.woodmac.com/press-releases/me-conflicts-impact-on-nea-gas-market/](https://www.woodmac.com/press-releases/me-conflicts-impact-on-nea-gas-market/)
- Wood Mackenzie: Middle East conflict drives European power, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/03/12/3254433/0/en/Wood-Mackenzie-Middle-East-conflict-drives-European-power-price-volatility-as-gas-disruption-removes-1-5-Mt-LNG-weekly-from-global-markets.html](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/03/12/3254433/0/en/Wood-Mackenzie-Middle-East-conflict-drives-European-power-price-volatility-as-gas-disruption-removes-1-5-Mt-LNG-weekly-from-global-markets.html)
- Europe is in dire straits, could run out of fuel within weeks as Iran war continues, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/europe-is-in-dire-straits-could-run-out-of-fuel-within-weeks-as-iran-war-continues/articleshow/129806803.cms](https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/europe-is-in-dire-straits-could-run-out-of-fuel-within-weeks-as-iran-war-continues/articleshow/129806803.cms)
- Strait of Hormuz blockade bites global chemicals sector | Wood Mackenzie, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/strait-of-hormuz-blockade-bites-global-chemicals-sector/](https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/strait-of-hormuz-blockade-bites-global-chemicals-sector/)
- OPEC+ to boost oil output by 206,000 barrels per day starting in April, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://economymiddleeast.com/news/opec-production-increase-april-2026-market-impact/](https://economymiddleeast.com/news/opec-production-increase-april-2026-market-impact/)
- OPEC+ Decides to Boost Production \- Rigzone, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.rigzone.com/news/opec\_decides\_to\_boost\_production-02-mar-2026-183102-article/](https://www.rigzone.com/news/opec_decides_to_boost_production-02-mar-2026-183102-article/)
- Opec+ agrees 206000 bpd increase as Iran conflict tests supply routes \- The National News, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/energy/2026/03/01/opec-agrees-206000-bpd-increase-as-iran-conflict-tests-supply-routes/](https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/energy/2026/03/01/opec-agrees-206000-bpd-increase-as-iran-conflict-tests-supply-routes/)
- The Choke Point as Conflict Hostage: The Fallout from the Strait of Hormuz, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://www.policymagazine.ca/the-choke-point-as-conflict-hostage-the-fallout-from-the-strait-of-hormuz/](https://www.policymagazine.ca/the-choke-point-as-conflict-hostage-the-fallout-from-the-strait-of-hormuz/)
- Addressing market concerns over an extended energy disruption | J.P. Morgan Asset Management, consulté le avril 9, 2026, [https://am.jpmorgan.com/au/en/asset-management/adv/insights/market-insights/market-updates/on-the-minds-of-investors/addressing-market-concerns-over-an-extended-energy-disruption/](https://am.jpmorgan.com/au/en/asset-management/adv/insights/market-insights/market-updates/on-the-minds-of-investors/addressing-market-concerns-over-an-extended-energy-disruption/)
Related Articles
Q1-SUPPLY-DESTRUCTION Q2-PRICE-IMPACT Q3-EUROPE-IMPACT Dallas-Fed-Hormuz-Closure EIA-STEO-April-2026 Goldman-Sachs-Forecast Morgan-Stanley-Outlook WTO-Hormuz-Trade-Tracker UNCTAD-Rapid-Assessment-2 Wood-Mac